THE COMPETITIVE CHALLENGES FOR THE POLISH STEEL INDUSTRY

1 SZMAL Arkadiusz
Institution:
1 Silesian University of Technology, Zabrze, Poland, EU, arkadiusz.szmal@polsl.pl
Conference:
23rd International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials, Hotel Voronez I, Brno, Czech Republic, EU, May 21 - 23, 2014
Proceedings:
Proceedings 23rd International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials
Pages:
1914-1919
ISBN:
978-80-87294-52-9
ISSN:
2694-9296
Published:
18th June 2014
Proceedings of the conference were published in Web of Science and Scopus.
Metrics:
245 views / 230 downloads
Abstract

Metallurgical enterprises operate in a highly turbulent environment, the existence of which is a natural consequence of globalization and consolidation processes. When observing the contemporary sector of steel producers, it is interesting to observe that during the process of dynamic changes some companies gradually dominated it. Over a few years, the list of the largest steel producers published by World Steel Association has changed dramatically. What was the reason for such big changes? What factors contributed to the fact that in the turbulent environment some companies gain while others lose their positions? The improving situation on the market creates new opportunities. However, enterprises discouraged by the lack of development prospects in the industry and declining income are reluctant to make strategic investment decisions. Cost optimization was the basic strategy to remain competitive in the market. Unfortunately, there must be a limit such activities. The steel industry has faced new challenges to remain competitive on the market. Thus, the main objective of this paper was to present the key competitive challenges for the Polish steel industry.

Keywords: competitiveness, change management, innovation, cooperation for innovation

© This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Scroll to Top